@Serge: Thank you for the idea!
I found my problem for running faster. It turns out the slope of the triangle
waveform is independent of the period so I had to apply a greater gain for the
sawtooth for it to cross zero. Now I am running at 50kHz.
Thanks,
Michael Greenish
From: Serge Steer <serge.st...@inria.fr>
To: users@lists.scilab.org
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] Faster PWM signal
Try with lower solver tolerances with the Simulate/Confiure menu.
Serge Steer
Le 15/10/2015 18:53, Michael Greenish a écrit :
Hello,
I am modeling an electrical circuit. I have a voltage across an inductor
being switched on the ground side. I am generating a pwm using a sawtooth
genartor as shown by the attached image. In my circuit, my PWM switches at
50kHz. When if I set the sawtooth generator period to > 0.025, the results
look as expected on the graphs. If the sawtooth generate period is < 0.025,
the results are flat; the system can't seem to calculate at that interval. The
period on the timer attached to the scope is 0.0001.
I am only at 25ms, I need to get to 0.02 ms to match my real-life circuit.
Is there a limit of the system I am running into or do I have a parameter
wrong?
Thanks,
Mike Greenish
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
