Hello all,
It seems that the overloading code ascribed to the Scilab function type
is not the same in Scilab 6 than in Scilab 5:
*in Scilab 5:*
[sind sind]
function %mc_c_mc(a,b), disp("code is mc"), endfunction
[sind sind]
-->[sind sind]
!--error 144
Undefined operation for the given operands.
check or define function %*mc*_c_*mc* for overloading.
-->function %*mc*_c_*mc*(a,b), disp("code is ""mc"""), endfunction
-->[sind sind]
code is ""mc""
*in Scilab 6:*
--> [sind sind]
Undefined operation for the given operands.
check or define function %*function*_c_*function* for overloading.
--> function %*mc*_c_*mc*(a,b), disp("code is mc"), endfunction
--> [sind sind] // mc does not work. This is not just a bad error
message:
Undefined operation for the given operands.
check or define function %function_c_function for overloading.
--> function %function_c_function(a,b), disp("code is ""function"""),
endfunction
--> [sind sind]
code is "function"
ans =
[]
I have not tested all operators, but at least this is also the case for
the vertical concatenation [;].
It this change intentional? It is not documented.
I am wondering why -- if back-compatibility is not an issue -- other
changes more expected are not done for Scilab 6 as well?
Best regards
Samuel Gougeon
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
