In a small laptop computer with Windows 10 and 32-bit versions of Scilab:
Scilab-5.5.2: size(mat) = [10000 7] mat took 0.08 sec to read. size(mat) = [10000 7] Scilab-6.0.0: size(mat) = [10000 7] mat took 39.14 sec to read. size(mat) = [10000 7] Regards Stefan On 2017-02-22 11:43, Lester Anderson wrote:
Haven't got as far as testing the functions, but just starting version 6 compared to 5.5.2 is slower; not sure what is going on. Testing on Windows 8.1 (4 Gb RAM). Do you have a test script to try, see if the issue can be reproduced? Cheers Lester On 22 February 2017 at 10:15, Stefan Du Rietz <s...@durietz.se> wrote:Hello, I got Scilab 6 to work in a Windows 10 laptop. However, my loading of data with read() took almost half an hour. From toc() and mprintf(): Loading of data took 26 min 23 sec In Scilab 5.5.2 it took just over a second. From toc() and mprintf(): Loading of data took 1.219 sec. What happened? Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
test_read.sce
Description: application/scilab
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
