Le 06/08/2019 à 15:44, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Le 06/08/2019 à 15:03, philippe a écrit :
.../...
I've just done this an get :
-> test_run("ast",[],"no_check_ref")
TMPDIR = /tmp/SCI_TMP_32597_VRKa5r
Module 001/001 - [ast] :
001/154 - [ast] Sand.........................................
( /usr/-6.0.2//bin/scilab -nwni -nb -quit --timeout 15m -f
/tmp/SCI_TMP_32597_VRKa5r/Sand.tst > /tmp/SCI_TMP_32
597_VRKa5r/Sand.res ) 2> /tmp/SCI_TMP_32597_VRKa5r/Sand.er
the command line "/usr/-6.0.2//bin/scilab" should be instead :
/usr/share/scilab-6.0.2/bin/scilab
.../...
--> SCI
SCI =
/usr/share/scilab-6.0.2/share/scilab
So, shouldn't the command line be
/usr/share/scilab-6.0.2/share/scilab/bin/scilab
intead of
/usr/share/scilab-6.0.2/bin/scilab
that you mention earlier?
OK, i have got it. Your binary is actually in
/usr/share/scilab-6.0.2/bin/scilab
This is why this "if" condition is useful in this case.
But still, if a standard installation is always done with this path
starting with /usr/*share/scilab*-6.0.2, then the bug should occur for
every Linux or Darwin user (with no binary located where expected in
first), unless it is a patch that has never been tested...
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
