Le 13/09/2019 à 16:17, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Le 13/09/2019 à 15:32, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
.../...
OK Samuel, I can forget this one. However, "double" should be kept as
an equivalent of "constant", even if not the name of a scilab type
returned by typeof(). We already have the macro "double()" (instead
of "constant()") and the keyword "double" used everywhere in the API.
AFAIR, in the commit, i was arguing against "constant", not against
"double".
IMO both can be implemented (to be able to automate the option out of
typeof()).
But /documenting/ "constant" as acceptable keyword would make me ill.
It's not an issue. Anyone else will be able to do it :-)
+1
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
