Besides the clc bug, why don't we try to repair mprinf ?
Le 12/12/2019 à 23:19, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Hello Chin Luh
Le 12/12/2019 à 17:10, Chin Luh Tan a écrit :
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for your reply.
Previously I was using clc(linenumtoclear) for showing this effect in
scilab, but i never thought of the mprintf, i was using disp that time
for i = 1:100
disp("Static counter : " + string(i));
sleep(1); clc(1)
end
I could not think using disp(). According to its expected behavior, it
always appends an \n, while we want to stay on the line, what's the
purpose of \r instead of \n, and mprintf() does not append anything to
what it is requested to display.
it seems that the mprintf also kind of broken? as it needs 3 \n to
get this result?
I do not think that disp() is broken. It looks OK, while clc(1) is
bugged
<https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16143>.
This is why extra \n are required for this workaround using clc.
I also tried to look into the clc C source and see whether I could
use the c code of clc in scilab api but no luck, but your example of
mprintf which need 3 \n inspired me to look into the mprintf c code
and see how it works.
Now that you know the clc code, please do not hesitate to propose a
patch for its clc(1) bug ;-))
Regards
Samuel
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
