Dear Chin Luh,
Thank you so much for addressing the critical topic of external modules
maintenance.
While IPCV is the most downloaded module, your fair question
>So should IPCV continue to be maintained ...?
sounds desperate to me. I rather share the same feeling: Almost 5 days
after your message, not a single answer from users...!
So, apparently, the answer is likely: No, it's not worth maintaining the
most downloaded module, and therefore No, it's not worth maintaining any
other external module.
Let's stop maintaining ATOMS for 2021. The ghosts of silent users are
certainly rich enough to pay commercial equivalent tools.
Since there are 12 days left before 2021, i will answer for particular
cases in separate (sub-)threads.
Best regards
Samuel
Le 14/12/2020 à 05:44, Chin Luh Tan a écrit :
Sometimes it is hard to decide whether to continue maintaining an
atoms module or not.... So I did "snapshots" of downloads on 9/11/2020
21:44 and 14/12/2020 12:20 respectively to see which modules are in
the actual top downloads.
Still, this is not a fair result, such as IPCV having some "patches"
which will increase the download number, and some other factors as well.
So should IPCV continue to be maintained ...?
Here's the results.
Image Processing and Computer Vision Toolbox 4620
CPGE 3176
MinGw toolbox 2946
Arduino 2936
CelestLab 2841
iodelay toolbox 2429
Coselica 1812
SIMM 1800
Image Processing Design Toolbox 1394
Fuzzy Logic Toolbox 1186
Scilab Computer Vision Module 1129
GUI Builder 972
Scilab Image and Video Processing toolbox 860
Distfun 855
Apifun 804
Serial Communication Toolbox 781
Time Frequency Toolbox 776
Free Access Chemometric Toolbox 770
Autoelem Toolbox 768
Specfun 738
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
