-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello Michael,
I know that. However, even with statically setting the MAC address to the ports the hosts are on, it did not forward the ethernet frames to those ports. Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards, Noel Kuntze GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658 Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658 Am 22.02.2015 um 14:08 schrieb Michael Schwartzkopff: > No. They started to handle it correctly. According to the specs a switch > SHOULD NOT learn a multicast MAC adress that belongs to a unicast IP adress. > Cisco always implemented it, but no other manufacturer. It seems that juniper > started to implement it. > > If you want to set up such a config, you have to configure the correct MAC > address in the switches in the ports. Atherwise you could have loops and you > will see much traffic. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6dmwAAoJEDg5KY9j7GZYk5gP/1VnLwOK193Xi/zTIjbemDjl 0VKxxILtRT89AQP0gfcUouzRg4doO2u28J7tSn4JmMe34KZEjby+k/IxhZ1/uLPk gAhBCqN3GpV2qGSYpFZBjg8DVjRv0o7eNuqplDQt4nq3De0JmZdU1LYyQFfOz2x9 9jaWIf9qs/4VpdcVAK5OyYt/qME+4OCRwxP7x8Vw/OeoyTINfhoxcREs/i5d5Ksx QzcJ0KbQhwafWrIuDjra9n//S0ZXttNEdzAt+msfB+XnBey1Ix7LNbg2LdVJJeV5 B2cjv01zJt7YS7Eo6vZfKfCupQfZS6vIxjZpaGM4SSs2LXdFveJvaxsNkDdMY+Sp X/veENJg2SGVM/O7HKH/7m43cH7c9k8OVU8LsO4mHo6W5HlilpgtPCkQkUgVjc3I N4TJvL+JcVKZccYjdOnh5regTEA6I8qGFoxD5XIgfCJmvvY1884BmzQe8SPEAADE ff1LcpGbb2u8SmipDC/hPvlb2H0yBDJiXwHyE68O3ans1hwsdGf4qmc0DkesZMh4 yHCDVlvnoigEKvUnfu1kIGEdFwoVIUw2FYChmLQ+sHQIAy7R5M6aAk+dqXo3PcKE /R3dbEPukBhcPGD1pgKWR1ugQToDgBnzpGzKYu3d615q3KEXk1sO1tNaBMhZHw3B v4/7/59cnI/TC2E5wmr0 =83xv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.strongswan.org https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users