Hi Tobias, I added the address to `eth0` and now strongswan inserts the proper route. So I think I'm all set!
Thanks for your insightful help, Bas On 20 March 2015 at 18:54, Tobias Brunner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bas, > >> My question now is to which interface should I attach 172.16.48.17? > > It doesn't really matter. If you don't actually suffer from #197 [1], > i.e. if you use strongSwan 5.0.1 or newer, you can add it to `lo`. > Adding it to eth0 does work too, that's what strongSwan does by default > when it installs virtual IPs it gets assigned dynamically from other > peers [2]. Routers on the Internet won't route packets with that > destination address to your host so it doesn't make much of a difference > if you install it on an interface connected to it or not. > > Regards, > Tobias > > [1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/197 > [2] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/VirtualIp > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
