Hi Anthony, > [...] and he didmention the possibility for using DAVICI. > mention the possibility for using DAVICI. The problem at the time was > Andreas lost the support person for this module. So we decided not to > take the risk.
I don't think there is much of an issue here. I definitely will take care of maintaining davici, as we use that in production extensively. There is not much going on in this repo [1], but this is mostly because it is a rather simple library (and mostly complete to do what it should). Regards Martin [1]https://github.com/strongswan/davici
