Hi Yogesh,

are you using an unmodified strongSwan peer on the other side or
a third party VPN product? If it is strongSwan, which version are
you using? Could you also send the configuration of the CHILD SA?

Regards

Andreas

On 29.10.2018 06:43, Yogesh Purohit wrote:
> Adding subject line to my query
> 
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:12 AM Yogesh Purohit
> <yogeshpuroh...@gmail.com <mailto:yogeshpuroh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Team,
> 
>     I am trying to establish tunnel with my strongswan.
>     But after receiving IKE_AUTH response my local strongswan end
>     (initiator) rejects tunnel saying ' length of
>     TRAFFIC_SELECTOR_SUBSTRUCTURE substructure list invalid'.
> 
>     And I am unable to get the reason for the same. Because I have
>     configured traffic selectors matching.
> 
>     IKE_Auth response which is recived is of 252 bytes, whereas when my
>     tunnel was established in other case IKE_AUTH response was of 204 bytes.
>     NOTE: I am trying the tunnel with PSK and version is IKEv2.
> 
>     So is there fixed bytes of IKE_AUTH response which is expected by
>     strongswan for PSK.
> 
>     And what does 'length of TRAFFIC_SELECTOR_SUBSTRUCTURE substructure
>     list invalid' means, I tried finding it in RFC, but could not find
>     the same.
> 
> 
>     Thanks & Regards,
> 
>     Yogesh Purohit
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Yogesh Purohit

-- 
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen                         andreas.stef...@strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Open Source VPN Solution!          www.strongswan.org
Institute for Networked Solutions
HSR University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil
CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland)
===========================================================[INS-HSR]==

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to