Victor Sudakov wrote: > Felipe Polanco wrote: > > > Does this not cause excessive SAs piling up? I've seen a similar > > > problem with Strongswan on my side and a MikroTik on the remote side: > > > too many excessive SAs in "ipsec status" output and in MikroTik's > > > management console. > > > > > > My theory was that each trapped packet causes a new SA to be > > > attempted/generated until some limit is hit or some resource is > > > exhausted. > > Haven't seen that issue. > > > > But you should use reuse_ike SA and reuse_child SA, that avoids duplicates > > SA for phase one and phase two. > > > > What's their equivalent in the old (ipsec.conf) syntax? I could not find > them in ipsec.conf(5)
There is charon.reuse_ikesa (default already "yes") in strongswan.conf(5) but no "reuse_child" even there. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
