I hate to disagree, as I'm a complete Newbie, but as I asked the question, originally, I should comment on what I found-
When you do a dist:snapshot-deploy or a jar:snapshot-deploy the archive created has a timestamp on it (down to the Second it was created IIRC.) You can have multiple snapshots deployed (I've got multiple created at the moment) I don't know how it works to pull the jar down, but I expect that it checks the date tag and pulls down the most recent. Luciano -----Original Message----- From: Rafal Krzewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:32 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: How adaptable is Maven's version system? Christian Clausen wrote: > Sorry for not being explicit. I disagree with the statement "you need to put the > name of the branch into the artifact name". In my example, the artifactId is the > same in all branches. With current maven, you can have only one snapshot version per artifact. If you project has two branches that need separate snapshots, it must deliver two distinct artifacts. There is no way around this, that I know of. Therefore the easiest way of achieving the objective of having distinct snaphost versions for both branches of your codebase is delivering two artifacts named in <artifact>-<branch> fashion. R. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
