On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 13:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think I read something in the mail archive about the project.xml being > just a big jelly script? In that message (I believe it from Jason), there > was a warning not to abuse this fact...for our own good. :-) Anyway, I > wanted to find out the level of jelly support provided in the project.xml. > Does this mean that I can use the following:
I would actually like to leave interpolation on in the project.xml but I would like to remove the use of Jelly being available simply to prevent any problems from occuring in the future. Jelly for the most part is desired because of other shortcomings in the core and some do see it as useful but I think in the long run it would be a mistake to allow Jelly use in the POM. > > > <project xmlns:j="jelly:core"> > > . > > . > > . > > > > <dependencies> > > . > > . > > . > > > > <j:import uri="parent-calculated-dependencies.xml" /> > > </dependencies> > > </project> > > > > If so, I'm missing something, because the parser appears to ignore this > tag... > > > > Does anyone have any advice? > > > > Thanks, > > John Casey -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
