On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:59, Vincent Massol wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 30 November 2003 20:41 > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo > > > > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > > What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why > not > > > collaborate? > > > > Forrest is massive overkill for most sites, additionally it barely > > worked when we started Maven and as far as I know is still rather > > unwieldly in terms of size and ease of use. > > > > I don't think anyone will ever convince me that Forrest is a better > > solution than simple Jelly+CSS. > > In any case, Maven has an open architecture and Forrest has a Maven > plugin. That's cool. Users can choose to use whichever they prefer.
Exactly. And no one to my knowledge ever got it working or continued to work on it. Forrest will probably never be the default rendering mechanism but no one is stopping anyone from making a plugin. > -- > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
