On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 13:06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Reports are similar, but JCoverage is under GPL and Clover not free for non > OSS projects.
I would rather pay for something than use the GPL. > Clover is better than JCoverage for report result. Personnaly, I prefer use > Clover for OSS projects. > > Do you have test it for see the result? Yah, I just looked. I'll stick with Clover. Is there any BSD licensed coverage tools that are any good? > Emmanuel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 6:59 PM > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] JCoverage Plugin > > > > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:37, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > > > So how does the JCoverage report compare to the clover report? > > > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
