> -----Original Message----- > From: Maczka Michal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:58 AM > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: RE: Depenceny version.. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:29 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Depenceny version.. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ext John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > The reason maven doesn't squawk at this is that it > > > doesn't check for > > > XML validity when parsing... > > > > Is this excpected to change in future releases? A non > > validating project.xml already was the source of some weird > > problems. Is the schema somewhere available online, so that > > you can define a schema location for it, which is public for all? > > > > Also, would it make sense to have a schema for maven.xml, too? > > > > Br, > > �_�������� __����� _� _ > > > > I doubt if it will be possible to validate POM using XML Schema. > The thing is that there is such thing like "POM inheritence" > and some mandatory tags can be inherited from parent project. > > It shouldn't be that hard to write our own POM validator in Java. > It even makes more sense then using XML based technlogies and POM > does't need. > > > Michal >
I haven't finshed the last sententece :) In the last sentence I meant that POM doesn't need to be read from XML. It can be read from db, file produuced by java serialization mechanism etc. Michal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
