It seems like
${project.build.directory}/generated-sources/<generator-name>
and
${project.build.directory}/generated-resources/<generator-name>
have been mentioned [1][2], but I wonder if something like this
${project.build.directory}/generated/<generator-name>
is more consistent.
With ${project.build.directory}/generated/<generator-name>, I could have
good consistency like:
${project.build.directory}/generated/<generator-name>/src/main/java
${project.build.directory}/generated/<generator-name>/src/test/scala
${project.build.directory}/generated/<generator-name>/src/main/resources
[1]
http://old.nabble.com/generated-sources-convention-td14430527.html#a14430527
[2]
http://old.nabble.com/maven-antrun-plugin%3A-Java-classes-don%27t-compile-after-an-Ant-task-td24300991.html#a24301576
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/generated-sources-resources-path-conventions-tp27145545p27145545.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
