a) This is the limitation/drawback of grouped dependencies. The dependencies you get through a grouped dependencies will be a level down (actually they will be transient deps). Thus, the dependency:analyzer will report false (not technically though) errors.
/Anders On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 23:43, lukewpatterson <lukewpatter...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Some questions about "grouped dependencies" [1]: > > a) Should dependencies introduced through "grouped dependencies" be > considered first-order dependencies? In the description of a grouped > dependency pom project: "You can ... add this project as a dependency and > all of its dependencies will be added to your project." The > dependency:analyze goal doesn't seem to understand grouped dependencies. > The "used undeclared" list can contain entries from the grouped dependency > project. > > b) How can I get the "nearest" non-pom artifacts from MavenProject? e.g. > I'd like to get the jars that this project directly depends on, and any > jars > that are directly listed in the grouped dependencies > > > Thanks > > > [1] > > http://www.sonatype.com/books/mvnref-book/reference/pom-relationships-sect-pom-best-practice.html#pom-relationships-sect-grouping-deps > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Some-questions-about-%22grouped-dependencies%22-tp27615566p27615566.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >