Ok. Thanks for the information.
Stephen Connolly-2 wrote:
>
> OK, I think you need to rethink your artifact versioning... especially
> w.r.t. how maven treats non-SNAPSHOT versions
>
> On 1 March 2010 10:02, yodee <mmu...@yodlee.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Its okay. We have development environment always called as "main". If
>> this
>> is successful we will roll out this to other versions where we will call
>> it
>> out as 1.0, 2.0, etc...
>>
>>
>> Wayne Fay wrote:
>> >
>> >> <code.version>main</code.version>
>> >> <version>${code.version}</version>
>> >
>> > If you're seriously using a version value of "main" then I think you
>> > need to rethink your artifact versioning...
>> >
>> > Wayne
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Maven-and-Properties-tp27740774p27741650.html
>> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Maven-and-Properties-tp27740774p27743339.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
