Hi Harald,
first of all thanks for your help...
Harald Entner-3 wrote:
>
> m4 does not have any dependencies to its submodules (it just aggregates
> them).
That seemed to be not the full truth...if i try to supplemental define a
dependency in my m4 module to make the dependency to m4.1 explicit...
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>${project.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>m4.1</artifactId>
<version>${project.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
I will get the following message:
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] The projects in the reactor contain a cyclic reference: Edge between
'Vertex{label='com.xyz.test.build:m4.1'}' and
'Vertex{label='com.xyz.test.build:m4.1'}' introduces to cycle in the graph
com.xyz.test.build:m4.1 --> com.xyz.test.build:m4.1
That's indicating that the dependency has been inserted already...
Harald Entner-3 wrote:
>
> so in order to build 3.2, it is sufficient that m4 is built first
> (e.g. maven includes modules and dependencies defined in m4).
In my opinion the dependencies of m4 should be built
first...(m4.1...m4.5)...
Harald Entner-3 wrote:
> Does it built correctly if you delete your repository (at least the m*
> entries? If it does, i don't see a problem, as it is still working that
> way.
Doesn't change anything in the order of the build....
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Dependencies-and-Aggregation-tp28214892p28215393.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
