Are you using a recent version of Maven? Once upon a time the
inheritence flag didn't work. FWIW you can also define inherit=false
on an execution

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Shan Syed <shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, but the problem is that when I do that, both executions occur, even
> when I specify inheritance=false.
>
> I basically need to use the same plugin for two different purposes, without
> either of them affecting the other; I tried to specify different versions
> for the mvn dep plugin (i.e. in one block, specify 2.0, and 2.1 for the
> other), but no dice.
>
> Running mvn help:effective-pom on my WAR projects always shows the second
> maven-dependency-plugin configuration from the root POM in the
> pluginManagement section
> BUT
> in the actual plugin block, it shows the following (below)
> (note the second execution, with not configuration or anything associated
> with it)
>
> What is the exact logic for the merging of plugin configs in a multimodule
> project?
>
> thanks
>
> S
>
>  <plugin>
>   <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
>   <version>2.1</version>
>   <executions>
>     <execution>
>       <id>unpack-wsdls</id>
>       <phase>generate-resources</phase>
>       <goals>
>         <goal>unpack</goal>
>       </goals>
>       <configuration>
>
> <outputDirectory>C:\dev\sk\sk-saml\sk-saml-web\sk-saml-server\target/war/WEB-INF/wsdl</outputDirectory>
>       </configuration>
>     </execution>
>     <execution>
>       <id>unpack-javascripts</id>
>     </execution>
>   </executions>
>   <configuration>
>     <artifactItems>
>       <artifactItem>
>         <artifactId>sk-javascript-token</artifactId>
>         <groupId>com.securekey.javascript</groupId>
>         <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>         <classifier>javascript</classifier>
>         <type>zip</type>
>       </artifactItem>
>     </artifactItems>
>   </configuration>
>  </plugin>
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Kalpak Gadre <kalpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have never tried declaring the same plugin twice, but you can simply
>> define more executions in the same plugin declaration like,
>>
>> <executions>
>> <execution>
>> <id>one</id>
>>         .
>>         .
>> </execution>
>> <execution>
>> <id>two</id>
>>         .
>>         .
>> </execution>
>> </executions>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kalpak
>>
>>
>>  Here's my scenario: I have a large multimodule project whose WARs share
>>> certain dependencies, which are packaged as zips by a few simple
>>> assemblies
>>> I wrote.
>>>
>>> I am using the maven-dependency-plugin to unpack the contents of these
>>> zips
>>> into their destination folders in the webapps.
>>>
>>> However, to reduce clutter and minimize maintenance, the majority of the
>>> plugin configuration is in the root POM, like so:
>>> (note that I am using the same plugin twice for two different reasons - is
>>> this valid?)
>>>
>>>      <build>
>>>           <pluginManagement>
>>>                <plugins>
>>>                      ...
>>>                     <!-- unpacking of JAVASCRIPT dependencies -->
>>>                     <plugin>
>>>                          <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>                          <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
>>>                          <inherited>true</inherited>
>>>                          <executions>
>>>                               <execution>
>>>                                    <id>unpack-javascripts</id>
>>>                                    <goals>
>>>                                         <goal>unpack</goal>
>>>                                    </goals>
>>>                                    <phase>package</phase>
>>>                                    <configuration>
>>>
>>> <outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/war/scripts</outputDirectory>
>>>                                    </configuration>
>>>                               </execution>
>>>                          </executions>
>>>                     </plugin>
>>>                     <!-- unpacking of WSDL dependencies -->
>>>                     <plugin>
>>>                          <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>                          <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
>>>                          <inherited>true</inherited>
>>>                          <executions>
>>>                               <execution>
>>>                                    <id>unpack-wsdls</id>
>>>                                    <goals>
>>>                                         <goal>unpack</goal>
>>>                                    </goals>
>>>                                    <phase>generate-resources</phase>
>>>                                    <configuration>
>>>
>>>
>>> <outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/war/WEB-INF/wsdl</outputDirectory>
>>>                                    </configuration>
>>>                               </execution>
>>>                          </executions>
>>>                     </plugin>
>>>                </plugins>
>>>           </pluginManagement>
>>>      </build>
>>>
>>> Some WARs need the WSDLs, some need the javascript files, while others
>>> don't
>>> need either - it will be up to the developers creating those projects.
>>>
>>> Here is an example usage in one of the WARs (note the ID of the execution,
>>> which is expected to be used to merge the whole configuration)
>>>
>>>      <build>
>>>           <plugins>
>>>                <plugin>
>>>                     <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
>>>                     <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>                     <inherited>true</inherited>
>>>                     <executions>
>>>                          <execution>
>>>                               <id>unpack-javascripts</id>
>>>                          </execution>
>>>                     </executions>
>>>                     <configuration>
>>>                          <artifactItems>
>>>                               <artifactItem>
>>>
>>> <artifactId>sk-javascript-token</artifactId>
>>>
>>> <groupId>com.securekey.javascript</groupId>
>>>                                    <version>${project.version}</version>
>>>                                    <classifier>javascript</classifier>
>>>                                    <type>zip</type>
>>>                               </artifactItem>
>>>                          </artifactItems>
>>>                     </configuration>
>>>                </plugin>
>>>           </plugins>
>>>      </build>
>>>
>>> So in general, the plugin configuration in the root POM will enforce some
>>> common things (destination folder, etc), and the usage will actually allow
>>> the developer to select what javascripts they need, without worrying about
>>> other configuration details.
>>>
>>> But the problem is when building, it's always the 2nd plugin configuration
>>> in the root POM that gets used, even though I specify the ID in the leaf
>>> POMs; so when I do an overall build, all the javascript files end up in a
>>> WSDL directory, even if I don't reference the WSDL execution at all.
>>> I inverse the order, and the result is the opposite; the javascripts end
>>> up
>>> in the right place, but all the WARs that have a WSDL dependency end up
>>> with
>>> a "scripts" directory full of WSDL files.
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that the ID is used to merge the configurations
>>> upon building the project, but I'm not seeing this. Is there a way to
>>> specify exactly what configuration to bind to?
>>> Specify two executions within the same<plugin>  causes the same behaviour,
>>> except with both folders.
>>>
>>> To generalize, in a multi-module project, how can I use the same plugin
>>> for
>>> totally different uses/scenarios?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Shan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to