> > > Nothing is going to break, the current API does not change. Make plugins > the way you currently make them. There are currently no supported embedding > APIs. Use components at your own risk because they are going to change. > Users will be fine using Maven and developing plugins as they did. This was > why Sonatype spent so much time making sure this adapter layer works the way > it does. It's the only way to use Guice without causing massive disruptions > to users. We achieved our goal and now it's time to get the 3.0 out. > > I'm fine with this, Maven beeing a plugin based system, plugin developers are mostly users, so stable plugin APIs are a requirement. I just wonder how a new core with Google Guice as core could open new opportunities for plugin APIs. But you're right, backward compatibility on plugins is the main feature to focus on to ensure Maven 3 adoption.
> > > >> > >> Then once the draft is published we can settle on the APIs and this is > not > >> going to happen in the 3.0 timeframe. It's likely to be a 3.1 thing. > >> > > > > Does this mean the only way to run a Maven 3.0.FINAL build in Hudson will > be > > "freestyle" job, until we get 3.1 out ? > > I have no idea. I've only ever used freestyle projects. > > Right, that's maybe the best way. Some user may claim for advanced features in Hudson allready supporter for Maven2, like incremental build. Wait & see... > > > > >> > >>> 2010/6/6 Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>> I have been running this patch on my CI (including m3 IT's) for quite > >>>> some time now, and it works really well here. Obviously, the more the > >>>> merrier! > >>>> > >>>> But then again, from a user's perspective this change really adds very > >>>> little to the excitement. It's supposed to be a transparent change > >>>> without any feature changes and as far as I can see that's exactly > what > >>>> it is. > >>>> > >>>> Kristian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> sø., 06.06.2010 kl. 21.45 +0200, skrev nicolas de loof: > >>>>> Can we use the CI server to check how this branch supports the IT > test > >>>>> harnesss ? It could make us more confident / help to detect > >>>>> incompatibilities when switching to Guive will become a concrete > >> option. > >>>>> > >>>>> Nicolas > >>>>> > >>>>> 2010/6/6 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > >>>>> > >>>>>> yup. > >>>>>> It build fine and it works for some builds I have tested since I > have > >>>>>> installed it (at least on my laptop :-) ) . > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2010/6/6 Jemos Infra <jemos.in...@googlemail.com>: > >>>>>>> On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 16:58 +0200, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >>>>>>>> stuff is here : > >>>>>>>> > >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-3/branches/guice-support/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks ! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Oliver, I take it this branch contains everything that's needed, > >>>>>>> right? I mean Maven-3, the Plexus-Guice adapter and all required > >>>>>>> dependencies in the POM. Correct? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> M. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Olivier > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy > >>>>>> http://fr.linkedin.com/in/olamy > >>>>>> http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/olivier.lamy7 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jason > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> Jason van Zyl > >> Founder, Apache Maven > >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > >> --------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> A language that doesn’t affect the way you think about programming is > not > >> worth knowing. > >> > >> -— Alan Perlis > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > the course of true love never did run smooth ... > > -- Shakespeare > > > >
