I just implemented the solution with the system property for the location of the logfile (https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/sardine/commit/74f2736bce4bb7d599ab9cf003135b1212c77ea6). Still interested in better solutions, though :-).
Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 21:16, Mirko Friedenhagen <mfriedenha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I will try. I use slf4j for logging. I normally log using > logback to stderrr. When > de.huxhorn.lilith.logback.appender.multiplex-classic is available, I > want to log to Lilith (http://lilith.huxhorn.de/), a graphical > logviewer. > > I think the relevant parts are: > > <!-- logging --> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId> > <artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId> > <version>1.6.1</version> > </dependency> > > <profile> > <id>lilith</id> > <dependencies> > <dependency>· > <groupId>de.huxhorn.lilith</groupId>· > > <artifactId>de.huxhorn.lilith.logback.appender.multiplex-classic</artifactId>· > <version>0.9.41</version>· > <scope>test</scope>· > </dependency> > </dependencies> > </profile> > > And in my logback-test.xml I have: > > <if condition='property("maven.profile").contains("lilith")'> > <appender name="multiplex" > class="de.huxhorn.lilith.logback.appender.ClassicMultiplexSocketAppender"> > <Compressing>true</Compressing> <!-- will automatically > use correct default port --> <!-- Default port for compressed is 10000 > and uncompressed 10001 --> > <ReconnectionDelay>10000</ReconnectionDelay> > <IncludeCallerData>true</IncludeCallerData> > <RemoteHosts>localhost</RemoteHosts> > </appender> > </if> > > I think I could workaround this by specify a system property > -Dlogback.configurationFile=src/test/resources/logback-with-lilith.xml > in the surefire plugin but just wanted to know if there is an easier > way to do this. > > Regards Mirko > -- > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 16:20, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Mirko- >> >> Profiles allow or restrict what is visible to the project hierarchy ... >> *usually* based on current environment conditions >> For example developing in Scandanavia you may allow greater access to >> properties than you would say when you are running demonstrations in the US >> >> can you provide an brief example of the profiles you are implementing in a >> comprehensive pom.xml so we may suggest an appropriate solution? >> >> Takk, >> Martin >> ______________________________________________ >> do not alter or disrupt this transmission. >> >> >>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:04:14 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: Accessing profiles via system properties etc. >>> From: mfriedenha...@gmail.com >>> To: users@maven.apache.org >>> >>> Really no one? I would appreciate a negative answer as well ;-) . >>> >>> On Sep 14, 2011 10:11 PM, "Mirko Friedenhagen" <mfriedenha...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > is there a possibility of accessing the activated Maven profile names >>> during test runs programmatically or in configuration files? >>> > >>> > I want to activate logging to Lilith in a Maven profile. Adding the >>> required dependency is no problem, but for adding the appended conditionally >>> seems not to be possible. Are the activated profile names exposed? >>> > >>> > Regards Mirko >>> > -- >>> > Sent from my phone >>> > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com >>> > http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
