I have used maven for CD on some projects... But I find CD to be less useful than a simple release often approach.
The key take home of CD for me is that you always should be able to release the master branch. That no long lived branches should exist is secondary. Actually pushing releases every commit/hour/day/week is less useful IMHO. On Tuesday, 11 September 2012, Ansgar Konermann wrote: > What will happen to maven if we moderate discussions touching continuous > delivery aggressively? > > Those who do want to use CD, which tools will they use? Where can they > learn how to use maven for CD? > > How can maven developers learn how maven could evolve to facilitate maven > usage in CD setups? > > What means are in place to allow this kind if exchange? > > If there is only little chatter in the maven community regarding CD, would > you choose maven when designing a fresh CD pipeline? > Am 11.09.2012 22:13 schrieb "Benson Margulies" > <[email protected]<javascript:;> > >: > > > Every time that 'continuous delivery' shows up on this mailing list, > > we end up with 10,000 lines of opinionated email about this > > extraordinarily controversial topic. > > > > I respectfully plead with all of you to use this mailing list for > > practical, answerable, questions about the behavior of Maven, and find > > some other venue to talk about CD. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]<javascript:;> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<javascript:;> > > > > >
