Hi all, > Feel free to create it an invite the people :)
Done: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/maven-nar Let's continue this thread there! Regards, Curtis On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Martin Eisengardt < martin.eisenga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Also, rather than migrating a fork directly, perhaps (if Mark agrees) we >> could migrate the @duns repo, then push all of Greg's changes back on top? >> That way, existing GitHub forks will all state "forked from >> maven-nar/maven-nar-plugin" afterward, which would be ideal. And to >> preserve old links Mark could fork it back into @duns again and update the >> README to state what happened. Thoughts? >> >> > > Sounds like a good plan. However I did not compare the forks so I do not > have an idea how many work has to be done. But I will have a look in the > next days. > > >> Presumably we would also want to similarly migrate cpptasks-parallel? >> >> > > I think so. It isn't maintained too (correct me if I am wrong). > > >> >> > Technical features can be discussed in the github wiki at the moment. >> >> Martin, shall we create a mailing list for the project? Perhaps a Google >> group? Then we can migrate this discussion there instead. >> >> > > Feel free to create it an invite the people :) > > >> >> Regarding cross-compilation: I know it is of interest (wouldn't it be >> great to build for multiple target platforms all from the CloudBees Jenkins >> on Linux?). My colleague has done quite a lot of work in that area, but >> there are some substantial obstacles. Shall we discuss further on our shiny >> new maven-nar-plugin mailing list, once it exists? >> >> > > Yeah, we should discuss it in a working group with experience on this > topic. Setting up cross compilation and having a maven-nar-plugin > supporting it is not that easy. > >