Le 2 août 2013 20:27, "Baptiste MATHUS" <m...@batmat.net> a écrit : > > > Le 2 août 2013 17:48, "Hervé BOUTEMY" <herve.bout...@free.fr> a écrit : > > > > > Le vendredi 2 août 2013 10:08:42 Curtis Rueden a écrit : > > > True, and it is good to warn about this. However, ultimately I think Git is > > > a better choice (than SVN) because it often makes code review much easier. > > I didn't use gerrit nor have seen anybody using it. But I hear about it more > > and more often as an argument why it makes git better than svn (even if I read > > that gerrit is a fork of rietveld, which is the same for subversion: but > > nobody even talks about it, don't know why). > > Is this pure theory? a dream? a reality for a minority of experts, talking > > about it loudly but no mere mortal can use it? > > (intentional provocational tone to motivate people who know to show me the > > direction to the light :) ) > > Just my 2 cents : been using gerrit professionally on a daily basis for 8 months now. So there's actually real people using it, I can testify ;). > > We're a team of ~10 guys. > > (For French savvy people I've given a short talk about it at the Toulouse jug. The session was recorded ans is hosted on parleys). > > > > > > If a new feature is properly developed on a topic branch with commits > > > squashed, rewritten and organized as needed, the history can be laid out in > > > a very easy-to-understand manner: new features and bugfixes done in > > > properly isolated commits, unit tests added immediately thereafter, etc. > > yes, with git, you can: with git, so much things can be done. > > But once again, I didn't see anybody do it, because it's a lot of work. > > You're right. I try to do it as often as I can. But perfection takes a bit too long to commit/rework and sometimes it's ridiculous ;).
Oops not sure I was clear. I was answering to 'lot of work's part. Not 'anybody...' because I actually do it and know many people doing it very often. I generally do it almost each time before pushing. > > > And it requires to be a git black belt. > > It helps to practice, sure. Btw, Gerrit makes it worse. It almost forces you to use advances features to make it really useful. > That's why I'd say putting a whole team both beginning with git and gerrit would be a mistake. > > > For the moment, just making a rebase before merging a branch seems hard for us > > mere mortals. > > > > > If > > > a commit is too large or conflates many different changes, Git provides the > > > tools to split up that work for rereview. > > > > > > Again, thanks for writing this. > > +1 > > I like it too > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >
