> > Nowhere in that was the sources jar mentioned - yet you seemed to have
> jumped directly to a solution and then said can’t be done.
> 
> No, I discussed the two paths from the POM: -sources and <scm/>

My mistake, sorry.

> > There is a critical need for this inside businesses as well as Debian (how 
> > do
> we know that "org.foobar:baz:1.2.3:jar" is MIT as it claims and doesn’t
> contain some GPL Code.
> 
> Which is a fine reason to contribute it Maven 4 where the POM could contain
> the necessary metadata to enable it.

This shouldn't prohibit something using what exists now.

One commercial company has done something for some subset of artifacts - which 
may have been entirely human process/mixed or automated.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to