Herve,

I'm looking at trying to add this functionality to maven-dependency-tree
but I want to start with a unit test showing the failure. But there doesn't
seem to be any unit tests for the DependencyGraphBuilder (for any
environment).

What's the best way to create a unit test that sets up the environment so
that I can explicitly test the Maven3DependencyGraphBuilder and
Maven31DependencyGraphBuilder?

William


On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>wrote:

> I don't really know: that's a precise feature that I didn't sudy
> dependency-tree is used in Maven plugins in contexts where components are
> already installed: so there is not much difference between reactor
> resolution
> and local repository resolution
>
> you're probably right: if reactor resolution is not done, it should be
> added,
> since that can be something generally expected from the component
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le jeudi 20 mars 2014 17:30:38 William Ferguson a écrit :
> > Herve,
> >
> > I didn't think I was asking for any extra flexibility out of
> > dependency-tree that it didn't already give. Are you saying that it
> doesn't
> > support resolution of projects in the current reactor?
> >
> > William
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr
> >wrote:
> > > maven-dependency-tree offers a really simple API: that's its objective.
> > > The drawback is that it is not very flexible
> > > The value is that it hides Maven 2, Maven 3.0.x and Maven 3.1.x+
> > > implementations, which are completely different (initial Maven 2 is
> made
> > > of
> > > listeners, Maven 3 uses Aether and Maven provider, with package changes
> > > from
> > > Maven 3.0 and 3.1)
> > >
> > > If you need more features, I think you'd better use Aether with Maven
> > > Provider: you can look both at maven-dependency-tree source to start
> and
> > > Aether examples to better understand Aether API, which is a lot more
> > > flexible<-
> > >
> > > >rich<->complex
> > >
> > > Notice that your initial code will use latest Aether, then your plugin
> > > will
> > > require Maven 3.1.x minimum. If you want compatibility with Maven 3.0.x
> > > and
> > > 3.1.x+, you'll have to add some reflection magic which might add
> > > complexity (it
> > > was not so easy to do it in maven-dependency-tree)
> > > If you want Maven 2 compatibility, I would personnally not really
> think it
> > > is
> > > reasonably feasible
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le jeudi 20 mars 2014 09:55:31 William Ferguson a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have a plugin that uses the maven-dependency-tree component to
> resolve
> > > > project dependencies in a LifeCycleParticipant. (We need early
> access to
> > > > deps because we need to modify the compile classpath).
> > > >
> > > > But I'm finding that with a clean repository, in a multi-module
> project
> > > > with modules X and Y-depends-on-X that the DependencyGraphBuilder is
> > > > throwing a DependencyGraphBuilderException when trying to resolve
> > > > Y-depends-on-X. It says that it cannot find X.
> > > >
> > > > So it appears that the maven-dependency-tree is only using
> information
> > >
> > > from
> > >
> > > > the repository and not the reactor.
> > > >
> > > > Is that expected?
> > > > Is there anyway that I can get MDT to resolve from the reactor?
> > > > Is there another approach that I should be taking to ensure that
> > >
> > > resolution
> > >
> > > > looks in the reactor?
> > > >
> > > > NB I need to support both maven 3.0 and 3.1 which is why we are using
> > > > MDT
> > > > to provide a level of abstraction above the 2 differing Aether
> > > > implementations.
> > > >
> > > > William
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to