Alexander,

AFAIK you may override the scope in the inheriting poms. If I remember
correctly I did this with junit as I needed it for an selenium test
project, where I had put base tests beneath src/main (to recite Brecht: oh,
don't ask why).

Regards
Mirko
-- 
Sent from my mobile
On Mar 28, 2014 2:59 PM, "Alexander Kriegisch" <alexan...@kriegisch.name>
wrote:

> I have a situation as follows:
>
>   - Multi-module project (~30 modules)
>
>   - Certain test dependencies (e.g. groovy-all) needed by nearly all
>     sub-modules are declared directly with test scope in the parent POM
>     (not just dependencyManagement, but also dependency). I know this is
>     considered to be bad practice but it saves a lot of redundant
>     dependency duplication.
>
>   - One new sub-module now actually also needs groovy-all, but with a
>     compile scope. So my wish (although seemingly unsupported by Maven)
>     is to override the default scope for this sub-module so as for the
>     dependency to be actually available during runtime.
>
> How can I do this or work around the need to duplicate my test
> dependencies in 30 modules just so as to be able to define the scope for
> the new module? AFAIK a POM can only inherit from one POM. But can I
> somehow use an "included POM" in my 30 modules in order to be able to
> centrally manage the test dependencies? Sorry if I am explaining this
> wrong or using incorrect erms, but I am by no means a Maven pro.
> Hopefully I was at least able to make my intent clear. I am looking for
> good advice beyond lecturing about how I should really, really declare
> everything 30 times in order to do it the Maven way. I am looking for
> alternatives, am willing to learn and hoping to get constructive answers.
>
> Thanks you all in advance
> --
> Alexander Kriegisch
>
>
>

Reply via email to