src/test/resources are included in the source-release artifact, yes.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:56 AM jieryn <jie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Would src/test/resources be included in the src artifact? I suspect not.
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > If this were a personal project, I'd probably do that... but this is for
> an
> > ASF project, and I don't want to put us in a position where we are
> > releasing with binaries in the source artifact.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:39 PM jieryn <jie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Create the jar and then put it under src/test/resources/my.jar and
> >> then refer to that my.jar in your testcase. It seems like an awful lot
> >> of trouble to dynamically create this test artifact, when you could
> >> just create it once and then add it to your repository. Yes, adding
> >> jars to your scm is generally bad, but this seems like a perfect
> >> exception.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi Maven Users list,
> >> >
> >> > What's the best way to create a jar during a build without attaching
> it?
> >> >
> >> > Currently, our pom is configured to use the maven-jar-plugin to create
> >> it,
> >> > but that plugin attaches an artifact, which gets deployed. We don't
> want
> >> > that. That doesn't seem to be configurable.
> >> >
> >> > We could create a mini project and use maven-invoker-plugin to package
> >> it,
> >> > but that's a lot of overhead (configuration and processing time) for a
> >> very
> >> > small test jar containing a single file (used to test a classloader).
> >> >
> >> > We've also considered just using maven-exec-plugin to execute the jar
> >> > command-line tool, but that's tricky to get right, accounting for
> >> > JAVA_HOME, toolchains, etc.
> >> >
> >> > Any suggestions, or is maven-invoker-plugin the best option?
> >> >
> >> > I think the maven-assembly-plugin might be able to do it, and it has
> an
> >> > <attach>false</attach> option, but I've never used it like this
> before.
> >> If
> >> > that's the best option, does anybody have any examples of that kind of
> >> > thing?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to