Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies: > I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of > -beta-1 is to introduce new, incompatible, stuff. The whole point of > that range is to exclude it.
Doesn't 2.0.0-beta1 imply that it's a beta for the 2.0.0 release, so that the final 2.0.0 release will include everything that's in this beta, thus the range quite correctly contains it...? If the stuff from the 2.0.0-beta1 will not be part of the final 2.0.0 release, wouldn't it be better called 2.0.1-beta1? Just curious because we had some discussions about versioning strategies here, too, a while ago. Regards, Flo
