Hi Laurent, I love bleeding edge stuff, but I don’t like SM stuff … guess java 9 multi-jars sound more SM than bleeding edge for me.
Guess it would not be good to base the build of an Apache project on that ;-) Chris Am 10.06.17, 09:31 schrieb "Laurent Perez" <hak...@gmail.com>: On a side note, in a few months, if you like to live dangerously, java9 comes with built-in support for multijar : http://in.relation.to/2017/02/13/building-multi-release-jars-with-maven/ laurent 2017-06-09 14:07 GMT+02:00 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com>: > Hi Paul, > > Paul Hammant wrote: > > > Older releases tried to have a single jar that had adaptive bytecode > > within, right Jörg > > > > Specifically, class file formats 49, 50, 51 in one Jar. > > This is still the case. The -java7 version just omits class files > targetting > Java 8, because in some environments they cause harm if the runtime is not > yet Java 8 compatible (Android, app servers scanning jars for annotations > ...). > > Cheers, > Jörg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- <a href="http://blog.jdeuxe.info/">http://blog.jdeuxe.info/ - Java entreprise tips & tricks</a> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org