In this case, is "configuration of pool" (I guess you mean like sizes etc)
really needed?
Would "use pool" (on/off) enough instead?

T

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 10:54 AM Michael Vitz
<vitz.mich...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:

> Yes, it seems the isStale-Implementation of BHttpConnectionBase
>
> ```
>     @Override
>     public boolean isStale() throws IOException {
>         if (!isOpen()) {
>             return true;
>         }
>         try {
>             final int bytesRead =
> fillInputBuffer(Timeout.ofMilliseconds(1));
>             return bytesRead < 0;
>         } catch (final SocketTimeoutException ex) {
>             return false;
>         } catch (final SocketException ex) {
>             return true;
>         }
>     }
> ```
>
> does not work correctly with the way Azure intercepts these connections.
>
> What's the way to improve the situation? Opening a bug there and waiting
> for it to be fixed? Or is the option to allow configuration of the pool,
> TTL and or Disabling the pool, like wagon did feasible?
>
> Am Mo., 27. März 2023 um 09:58 Uhr schrieb Konrad Windszus <
> konra...@gmx.de
> >:
>
> > Thanks for the reproducer and sorry for not reading thoroughly before.
> > Indeed the connection pool is not configurable yet with the native
> > connector. According to
> >
> https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-4.5.x/current/httpclient/apidocs/org/apache/http/impl/conn/PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager.html
> > stale connections are checked after 2 seconds before being reused but
> > probably the check does not work for some reason with Azure….
> >
> > > Am 27.03.2023 um 09:49 schrieb Michael Vitz <
> vitz.mich...@googlemail.com
> > .invalid>:
> > >
> > > Hi Konrad,
> > >
> > > The only two timeout related properties are
> > aether.connector.requestTimeout
> > > and aether.connector.connectTimeout.
> > > Both do not solve my problem.
> > >
> > > I created a GitHub project (
> > > https://github.com/mvitz/maven-39-gh-actions-timeouts) which
> reproduces
> > the
> > > problem.
> > > It declares many dependencies/plugins to make sure the complete HTTP
> pool
> > > is used before the tests, contains a test that runs in total about 6
> > > minutes to take longer than the four-minute Azure timeout and uses
> Maven
> > > 3.9.1.
> > >
> > > The first build (
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/mvitz/maven-39-gh-actions-timeouts/actions/runs/4524745997/jobs/7968775993
> > )
> > > uses -Daether.connector.requestTimeout=270000 which is longer than four
> > > minutes and fails.
> > > The second one (
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/mvitz/maven-39-gh-actions-timeouts/actions/runs/4524925829/jobs/7969075725
> > )
> > > uses -Daether.connector.connectTimeout=60000
> > > -Daether.connector.requestTimeout=180000 which is shorter but fails,
> too.
> > >
> > > Both builds fail with:
> > > Error:  Failed to execute goal
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:3.3.0:jar (default-jar) on
> > > project maven-39-gh-actions-timeouts: Execution default-jar of goal
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:3.3.0:jar failed: Plugin
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:3.3.0 or one of its
> > dependencies
> > > could not be resolved: Failed to collect dependencies at
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:jar:3.3.0 ->
> > > org.apache.maven.shared:file-management:jar:3.1.0: Failed to read
> > artifact
> > > descriptor for org.apache.maven.shared:file-management:jar:3.1.0: The
> > > following artifacts could not be resolved:
> > > org.apache.maven.shared:file-management:pom:3.1.0 (absent): Could not
> > > transfer artifact org.apache.maven.shared:file-management:pom:3.1.0
> > from/to
> > > central (https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2): Read timed out ->
> [Help
> > 1]
> > >
> > > I suspect that the HTTP pool is fully used before the tests, all
> > > connections are silently interrupted during the test run that takes
> > longer
> > > than the Azure limit of four minutes, and the pool unable to recover
> any
> > > connection from that.
> > >
> > > As told before when using wagon with -Dmaven.resolver.transport=wagon
> and
> > > configuring a pool time to love of 3 minutes via
> > > -Dmaven.wagon.httpconnectionManager.ttlSeconds=180 everything works as
> > > expected (
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/mvitz/maven-39-gh-actions-timeouts/actions/runs/4529868249/jobs/7978093099
> > > ).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >> Am So., 26. März 2023 um 12:54 Uhr schrieb Konrad Windszus <
> > konra...@gmx.de
> > >>> :
> > >>
> > >> The timeouts are configurable even with new native connector:
> > >> https://maven.apache.org/resolver/configuration.html.
> > >> Please try if those settings help.
> > >> Konrad
> > >>
> > >>> Am 25.03.2023 um 15:08 schrieb Michael Vitz <
> > vitz.mich...@googlemail.com
> > >> .invalid>:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> We recently switched from Maven 3.8.x to 3.9.x and all of a sudden,
> we
> > >> ran
> > >>> into connection timeouts during downloading the maven-jar-plugin
> after
> > >> all
> > >>> tests passed.
> > >>>
> > >>> After some digging, I suspect that it is a combination of GitHub
> > Actions
> > >>> running on Azure which silently drops open connections after around
> > four
> > >>> minutes (see discussion in
> > >>> https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/1499) and the switch
> > to
> > >> the
> > >>> native HTTP transport in Maven 3.9.x.
> > >>> Our tests take quite some time and because the maven-jar-plugin is
> > >> freshly
> > >>> downloaded after these, the used connection was opened before the
> tests
> > >>> were started and is dropped by Azure meanwhile.
> > >>>
> > >>> Our current workaround is switching to the old Wagon HTTP provider
> > (with
> > >>> -Dmaven.resolver.transport=wagon) and setting a TTL for the used HTTP
> > >> pool
> > >>> (-Dmaven.wagon.httpconnectionManager.ttlSeconds=180) or disabling the
> > >> pool
> > >>> and keep alive (-Dhttp.keepAlive=false
> -Dmaven.wagon.http.pool=false).
> > >>>
> > >>> Unfortunately, the new HTTP transport does not allow changing the TTL
> > >>> (which by default is -1 which means forever) or disabling it
> > altogether.
> > >> It
> > >>> would be nice if such settings would be added in one of the next
> > >> releases.
> > >>>
> > >>> I would be happy to help/try to provide a patch on my own if this
> > helps.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Michael
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to