How tests are simulated within maven-surefire? is there any example?

Would I be able to create an optional module where I do a test-leak
using my library to validate if it leaked or not?

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 5:33 PM Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I tried looking at how I would contribute a fix, but I lacked an
> understanding on how tests are performed in surefire.
>
> Also: would you accept a test that's using check-leak to prevent
> future leaks like this? (maybe a separate sub-module for this
> test?)... and where I would add such test?
>
> I would even dedicate my personal time into proposing a fix if I can
> get some basic understanding about this.
>
>
> Is there a chat channel I can ask questions about the codebase? or the
> user's or dev's list is a good place to start?
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 5:24 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Clebert,
> >
> >
> >
> > Il Mar 11 Lug 2023, 15:55 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > created a JIRA:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2186
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Would you have time to contribute a fix?
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:33 AM Clebert Suconic
> > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You guys need to be careful with non static ThreadLocals.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ClassMethodIndexer has a non static ThreadLocal.
> > > >
> > > > threadLocals will create a hashEntry somewhere deep in the JDK.
> > > > Depending on the number of tests that are running you guys may break
> > > > things like ReadWriteLock because it will transverse a lot of entries.
> > > > (I have been bitten by this before).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Also, I have a reproducer:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > git clone https://github.com/clebertsuconic/surefire-reproducer.git
> > > > cd surefire-reproducer
> > > > mvn install
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This little project is using check-leak to count the number of
> > > > instances of ClassObject. I have set the assertions as max 20
> > > > instances. I have a copy&paste test that is validating this over and
> > > > over.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And it's always leaking inside a ConcurrentHashMap that's being held
> > > > by ClassMethodIndex which is used by JUnit4Listener.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and you guys should really stop using non static ThreadLocals.. I have
> > > > found another case where it was used but at least the remove was
> > > > called.. but still a bit scary to my test (It should just use a static
> > > > final... what's the point of a ThreadLocal if it's not static on a
> > > > class an associated to the instance?)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Should I open a JIRA about this?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 2:13 PM Clebert Suconic
> > > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > We have recently upgraded surefire into artemis  from 2.x, and
> > > > > strangely our testsuite started to crash because of memory.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So, it happens that I had other memory leaks in the past and I became
> > > > > addicted into finding them, up to a point that I created a project
> > > > > that will track memory usage over a java app, or be used on test cases
> > > > > to make sure leaks are not happening:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/check-leak/check-leak
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I ran this testsuite from artemis:
> > > > >
> > > > > git clone g...@github.com:apache/activemq-artemis.git
> > > > > cd activemq-artemis
> > > > > mvn install -DskipTests=true
> > > > > cd tests/integration-tests
> > > > > mvn -Ptests tests
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > get check-leak:
> > > > > curl
> > > https://github.com/check-leak/check-leak/releases/download/0.11/check-leak-0.11.jar
> > > > >
> > > > > so after finding the process ID for the surefire:
> > > > > java -jar check-leak-0.11.jar --sleep 5000 --pid <surefire-pid>
> > > > > --report ./report-leak
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As the test progress, open ./report-leak/index.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > you may refresh the page as the process go.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > and if you look at the objects  allocations for
> > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.api.util.internal.ClassMethod, the
> > > > > allocations are only growing after the lates version, and never being
> > > > > released.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > is there any idea about what might be causing it?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > if you have a big project with many tests like I do, memory
> > > > > allocations may be an issue and I would need to use a bigger VM just
> > > > > because of this probably leak.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to