Seems related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18003
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:43 AM Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> wrote: > > Howdy, > > it seems the 10.0.0 release is broken? See this: > https://gist.github.com/cstamas/da323829c563411d0858fda070dbc74c > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:28 AM Thorsten Heit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > just tried with 3.9.12, same results. > > > > > > Thorsten > > > > > > Am 12.03.26 um 11:21 schrieb Tamás Cservenák: > > > Do you have same thing happening with 3.9.12? > > > > > > T > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026, 10:47 Thorsten Heit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I forgot to mention that this was tested with Maven 3.9.13 and Java 25 > > >> (Temurin 25.0.2 to be precise) on Windows 11 if that matters. > > >> > > >> > > >> /Thorsten > > >> > > >> Am 12.03.26 um 10:32 schrieb Thorsten Heit: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I have asked this on the Solr mailing list before, but got no helpful > > >>> answer so far. I hope someone here as a glue what's going on: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I have written an internal library that uses SolrJ for connecting to a > > >>> (remote) Solr server. The library is a multi-module project consisting > > >>> of several parts; the interesting ones are: > > >>> > > >>> - a common module that represents the bridge to Solr (by using SolrJ) > > >>> - a test module that implements JUnit tests and an integration test; > > >>> uses jetty-maven-plugin to start a local Solr server with an empty > > >>> database before the IT is executed > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Actually I'm using the following dependencies in the IT module pom > > >>> (unnecessary parts omitted): > > >>> > > >>> <dependencies> > > >>> <dependency> > > >>> <groupId>org.apache.logging.log4j</groupId> > > >>> <artifactId>log4j-core</artifactId> > > >>> </dependency> > > >>> <dependency> > > >>> <groupId>${project.groupId}</groupId> > > >>> <!-- bridge to connect to Solr: --> > > >>> <artifactId>solr-connector-common</artifactId> > > >>> <version>${project.version}</version> > > >>> </dependency> > > >>> <dependency> > > >>> <groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId> > > >>> <artifactId>solr-core</artifactId> > > >>> <version>${solr.version}</version> > > >>> </dependency> > > >>> > > >>> <dependency> > > >>> <groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId> > > >>> <artifactId>junit-jupiter-engine</artifactId> > > >>> <scope>test</scope> > > >>> </dependency> > > >>> <dependency> > > >>> <groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId> > > >>> <artifactId>junit-jupiter-params</artifactId> > > >>> <scope>test</scope> > > >>> </dependency> > > >>> </dependencies> > > >>> > > >>> (the property "solr.version" is defined in the parent pom) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> With solr-core-9.10.1 "mvn dependency:tree" gives me > > >>> > > >>> (...) > > >>> [INFO] +- org.apache.solr:solr-core:jar:9.10.1:compile > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:9.12.2:compile > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-analysis-common:jar:9.12.2:compile > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:9.12.3:compile > > >>> (...) > > >>> [INFO] | \- org.xerial.snappy:snappy-java:jar:1.1.10.8:runtime > > >>> [INFO] +- > > >>> org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt.annotation:jar:2.4.100:provided > > >>> [INFO] +- org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.junit.platform:junit-platform-engine:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | | +- org.opentest4j:opentest4j:jar:1.3.0:test > > >>> [INFO] | | \- org.junit.platform:junit-platform-commons:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api:jar:1.1.2:test > > >>> [INFO] | \- org.jspecify:jspecify:jar:1.0.0:runtime > > >>> [INFO] \- org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> (...) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> What puzzles me that the same command with solr-core-10.0.0 only shows > > >>> > > >>> (...) > > >>> [INFO] +- org.apache.solr:solr-core:jar:10.0.0:compile > > >>> [INFO] +- > > >>> org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt.annotation:jar:2.4.100:provided > > >>> [INFO] +- org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.junit.platform:junit-platform-engine:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | | +- org.opentest4j:opentest4j:jar:1.3.0:test > > >>> [INFO] | | \- org.junit.platform:junit-platform-commons:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> [INFO] | +- org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api:jar:1.1.2:test > > >>> [INFO] | \- org.jspecify:jspecify:jar:1.0.0:runtime > > >>> [INFO] \- org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params:jar:6.0.3:test > > >>> (...) > > >>> > > >>> i.e. no dependencies at all in solr-core-10.0.0 in the tree. Therefore > > >>> the IT test fails with ClassNotFoundExceptions when Jetty starts the > > >>> local server: > > >>> > > >>> (...) > > >>> [WARNING] Failed startup of context > > >>> oeje10mp.MavenWebAppContext@54bd2345{/solr,/solr,b=file:///(...)/solr- > > >>> connector-tests/src/main/ > > >>> webapp/,a=STOPPED,h=oeje10s.SessionHandler@10897221{STOPPED}}{file:/// > > >>> (...)/solr-connector-tests/src/main/webapp/} > > >>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/solr/common/cloud/ > > >>> ClusterPropertiesListener > > >>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0 (Native Method) > > >>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredConstructors > > >>> (Class.java:2985) > > >>> at java.lang.Class.getConstructor0 (Class.java:3180) > > >>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructor (Class.java:2491) > > >>> at > > >>> > > >> org.eclipse.jetty.ee10.servlet.ServletContextHandler$ServletScopedContext.createInstance > > >> (ServletContextHandler.java:2023) > > >>> at org.eclipse.jetty.ee10.servlet.BaseHolder.createInstance > > >>> (BaseHolder.java:203) > > >>> (...) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> But: > > >>> > > >>> When you look at the pom of solr-core-10.0.0 there are indeed lots of > > >>> dependencies; if I counted correctly 76 in sum, 9 having scope > > >>> "compiled" and 67 with scope "runtime". > > >>> Additionally the poms of solr-core-9.10.1 and solr-core-10.0.0 don't > > >>> differ much. The dependencies are basically the same, some with newer > > >>> versions; a few removed, a few added IIRC. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> To make the IT work again I manually have to add about a third of the > > >>> dependencies defined in solr-core-10.0.0 such as org.apache.solr:solr- > > >>> solrj, org.apache.solr:solr-solrj-zookeeper, tons of lucene dependencies > > >>> etc. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Has somehere a clue why this is necessary? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> > > >>> Thorsten > > >> > > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
