hibernate should be in different groupIds because they have changed the package names.
On 7/8/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:14:15AM -0700, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > Ok, I can copy them in the repo > > > > hibernate 2.x to groupId net.sf.hibernate > > hibernate 3.x to groupId org.hibernate > > > > ibatis 1.x to artifactId ibatis1 > > ibatis 2.x to artifactId ibatis2 > > I don't think having different group ids is a good solution to this > problem and probably just confusing to the users. I'm honestly not sure > what the best solution is. Is it really possible to have both artifacts in > the classpath at the same time? At least I would assume that this would > depend on the ordering of the classpath. > > > > > do you think this is the right way? > > Not sure, anybody else have a opinion? > > -- > Trygve > > > BodyID:254779857.2.n.logpart (stored separately) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
