you are a beautiful man john...:)

On 9/8/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> That's correct. I've added this functionality to my local working copy,
> and will commit it as soon as I've verified that it doesn't break the 
> build.
> 
> What I'm adding is a <properties/> section directly inside the
> <project/> element. You will then have the ability to reference these
> properties within the POM by using ${property-name} in your plugin
> configurations, etc.
> 
> That should be in within an hour or so. I got sidetracked, or I would've
> had it checked in earlier (last week). :)
> 
> - -john
> 
> Brett Porter wrote:
> | Actually, I believe we are adding this... John?
> |
> | - Brett
> |
> | On 9/8/05, Andy Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> |>At 08:02 AM 9/8/2005, Ashley Williams wrote:
> |>
> |>>Can I declare a maven property like in Ant at the top of my pom and
> |>>use it further down? Didn't see anything immediately obvious in the
> |>>maven project descriptor help page.
> |>
> |>Ashley,
> |>
> |>The nature of the Ant and the M1 execution environments lent themselves 
> to
> |>this technique much more than the M2 environment does. Its almost as if 
> M2
> |>was explicitly designed to remove this capability. :-) So, the short
> |>answer
> |>is no. I suppose that there might be some way to work around this, but 
> its
> |>hurting my head just to think about it.
> |>
> |>
> |>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> |>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |>
> |>
> |
> |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFDIEFsK3h2CZwO/4URAuThAKCM1pRO/W+DiqR4wIJk4fl/BAnMFwCgoFxx
> 3K1LJtu5T+Le6bvAQjID8J8=
> =0g1K
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
jesse mcconnell

Reply via email to