On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 22:02 +0000, John Fallows wrote: > On 9/25/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 04:31 +0000, John Fallows wrote: > > > On 9/23/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 08:03 +0000, John Fallows wrote:
[snip] > > [1]: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-932 > > Yes, I understand that it would be generally useful to deliver a > subset of the unit test code as a JAR. > > The above proposal still stands though, although the name "mock" can > be treated as a placeholder for that subset until we have a better > name. Not sure I agree, what more than distributing the test do you need? > Alternatively, is there any mileage in the idea of having completely > separate sub-modules for main, mock, and test, all inside the > api-module? Don't think so, but I also think I'm missing some information here :) -- Trygve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
