On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 17:12 +0200, Jose Gonzalez Gomez wrote: > So I have the feeling that this is not the right approach... What I > would probably do is drop the docbook support in Doxia (or keep it > deliberately simple), as I see no reason to write a Maven site using > Docbook: APT or HTML/XHTML are much more adequate to do that.
I think keeping the simple format would be fine. > Any way, I think a plugin for managing Docbook files is needed, as I > may want to generate project documentation in PDF format, JavaHelp > files, whatever that doesn't go directly into the Maven site... this > should be included in the build process of the project, as it's just > another deliverable, or artifact in the Maven vocabulary. And this > should be done using the Docbook stylesheets, as there is a lot of > effort put into them, and they're proved and reliable. Also I don't > think writing all this support into Doxia is neither sensible nor > possible. > > What do you think about this? If you want full blown docbook support then I think you are right in that a separate plug-in would probably make more sense. I think we'd be happy to host a docbook plug-in at the Mojo project: http://mojo.codehaus.org > Best regards > Jose > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
