http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+Plugin+Matrix
JDeveloper plugin is only for maven 1.0. Nobody has maintened it since then. We also use Jdeveloper and we are looking for a plugin too. Maybe we'll have to develop it. 2005/10/28, Dave EDMONDS PSE 54839 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > Recently downloaded Maven 2.0, as part of an evaluation within our > development team as to whether it would benefit our development efforts. > > Currently, we use JDeveloper 10g as our development tool, and so the > JDeveloper plugin looked great for our needs. However, on trying to use with > Maven, the log tells us... > > [INFO] The plugin 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jdeveloper-plugin' does > not exist or no valid version could be found > > ... whenever we attempt to call the JDeveloper functions. Just to confirm > a few things: > Proxy server settings are made in settings.xml - I have been able to use > compile, test and site goals with no problems.I've attempted to download > the plugin(s) from > http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/jdeveloper/downloads.html which > worked, but won't integrate with Maven.Editing the > maven-metadata-central.xml file still refuses to locate the > plugin.Anysuggestions? > > On a related note, does anyone know whether there is the ability to > generate .JWS (JDeveloper Workspace) files from this plugin? > > Many thanks, > > Dave Edmonds > ISD Software Solutions > Kent Police, UK > > > > This Email and any accompanying document(s) contain information from Kent > Police, which is confidential or privileged. > The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) or bodies to whom it is addressed. > If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is > prohibited. > If you have received this Email in error please notify us by telephone > immediately. > The copyright in the contents of this email and any enclosures is the > property of Kent Police and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is > contrary to the provisions of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. > -- Alexandre Poitras Québec, Canada
