Hi Chris, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 4:17 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Building C++ projects with Maven (2)
> 
> Hi Mark,
> So, if I have it right, your solution is to transparently 
> augment the versionId on-the-fly?? And you keep all of these 
> artifacts together in the same repo dir i.e. all under the 
> same version subdir (in m2) i.e. 
> openssl/0.9.8/i386-linux-gcc-openssl-nar-0.9.8.nar

correct, with the exception that the -nar- part in the filename is gone
since m2 reports all dependencies irregardless of types, and the 
classifier is at the end.

So you would end up with:

0. openssl/0.9.8/openssl-0.9.8.pom
1. openssl/0.9.8/openssl-0.9.8.jar
2. openssl/0.9.8/openssl-0.9.8-noarch.nar
3. openssl/0.9.8/openssl-0.9.8-i386-linux-gcc.nar
4. openssl/0.9.8/nar/include
5. openssl/0.9.8/nar/lib/i386-linux-gcc/shared/openssl-0.9.8.so

where 0. is the generic pom file, referring to other jar and/or nar 
dependencies,
1. is a standard jar file, which may contain class files, but for sure contains
a properties file referring to 2. and 3. The nar-plugin will download 2. and 3.
and unpack them in 4. and 5. if another project is dependent on openssl-0.9.8.

Regards
Mark Donszelmann


> Thanks,
> -- Chris
> 
> On 11/1/05, Donszelmann, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > that is what we did with our NAR (Native Archive) plugin in 
> Maven 1, 
> > which we are porting to M2 at this time.
> >
> > See for maven 1:
> >
> > http://java.freehep.org/freehep-nar-plugin
> >
> > we let the user depend on an artifact, and add 
> > Architecture-OS-Linkername to it.
> >
> > Regards
> > Mark Donszelmann
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Roger Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:28 PM
> > > To: Maven Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Building C++ projects with Maven (2)
> > >
> > > The concern I would have with this is that you have the 
> same logical 
> > > package (let's say apr 1.2.2) built for different architectures 
> > > needing to have a different groupId or artifactId for each 
> > > architecture type. Unless the groupId or artifactId is 
> constructed 
> > > dynamically, poms that depend on a native artifact have 
> to depend on 
> > > a specific architecture type. I think it would be nice to write 
> > > generic poms that depend on just the logical package (apr 1.2.2 
> > > instead of apr
> > > 1.2.2 x86_64) and have maven sense the machine 
> architecture (and OS) 
> > > and fetch the correct native artifact.
> > >
> > > Roger
> > >
> > > On 11/1/05, dan tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You can use groupId for platform specific or add 
> platform specific 
> > > > string to your artifact id.
> > > > -D
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/1/05, Chris Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This brings up a bigger question; How does maven want to
> > > handle OS
> > > > > information in the repo?? To be successful w/ other
> > > languages like
> > > > > C,
> > > > the
> > > > > repo will need to delineate information such as "i586"
> > > and "linux".
> > > > > Are these to be rolled into the groupId?? That doesn't
> > > smell right.
> > > > > Seems
> > > > that
> > > > > we may need new Artifact Resolvers that understand this
> > > sort of info
> > > > > natively and can transparently supply the the correct
> > > pieces to the URL.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > -- Chris
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/1/05, dan tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi David,
> > > > > > There is a work in progress for native-maven-plugin 
> > > > > > http://svn.mojo.codehaus.org/trunk/mojo/maven-native/
> > > > > > You can build it and take a look at some doc.
> > > > > > -Dan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/1/05, David Jackman 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've just found out that I'm going to need to expand
> > > our Maven
> > > > > > > build process to include several C++ project (which I 
> > > > > > > believe are built
> > > > > using
> > > > > > > gcc). I seem to remember seeing some traffic on this list 
> > > > > > > from
> > > > people
> > > > > > > doing this sort of thing (which I promptly 
> ignored because I 
> > > > > > > wasn't
> > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the time). Can anyone offer some insight on how you
> > > got this to
> > > > > > > work and how you overcame the problems that came up? What 
> > > > > > > plugins are available to build this way and do they do 
> > > > > > > everything you need? Are
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > able to have dependencies in the Maven repository and
> > > have the
> > > > > > > build
> > > > > use
> > > > > > > them from there (similar to .jar dependencies)? 
> How do you 
> > > > > > > access
> > > > the
> > > > > > > header files, possible library, and runtime 
> library for the
> > > > different
> > > > > > > portions of the build? Is there a mini guide for 
> this kind 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > project
> > > > > > > in the works?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > ..David..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to