This sounds great brett - glad to hear that. On 12/14/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is exactly what we plan to do. There is work under way to set up > the necessary permission system and web of trust. Ideally, it will be > the projects themselves doing so, but we realise this won't always be > the case. > > BTW, we just did a big key signing at ApacheCon. If you ever wind up > at a face to face with other people in the community, make sure you > create and sign each others PGP keys! > > Cheers, > Brett > > On 12/14/05, Arik Kfir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry for butting in - but how about adding some (willing) people as > > administrators of *parts* of the ibiblio repo? I for example wouldn't > > mind being responsible for managing, say, the jboss section. This > > means that the admin only has permissions for that particular > > directory of the ibiblio repo and he/she need only to concentrate on > > that (new versions, POM fixes). > > > > We can thus divide the workload between the community and let the core > > Maven team concentrate more on the core product. In addition, if every > > admin is responsible for a group of products he/she are using anyway, > > I'm sure the quality of the POMs and their maintenance will go up as > > well. > > > > What do you think? > > > > On 12/14/05, Ralph Pöllath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 14.12.2005, at 10:14, cameron101 wrote: > > > > It would be great if the likes of Spring / Hibernate and other > > > > mainstream > > > > OSS vendors released new versions to Maven with all the POM's and > > > > direct > > > > dependencies. They themselves would benefit as the community would > > > > probably > > > > have a faster take up of new technologies and therefore progress the > > > > discovery and fixing of bugs and new functionality. > > > > > > Unfortunately, this sounds highly unlikely for Spring. They just > > > demoed their build system "common-build" at the Spring Experience > > > conference which is based on Ivy: > > > http://www.jroller.com/page/raible? > > > entry=spring_agile_development_challenges_by > > > > > > So yes, I agree we need more lobbying. I love Spring, but I don't > > > need yet another build system. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > -Ralph. > > > > > > > On 13/12/05, Srepfler Srgjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I personally think that we should lobby for grater use of maven2. > > > >> I mean > > > >> with all respect to maven you team just can't and shouldn't handle > > > >> this > > > >> enormous repository. I mean the hibernate guys should build their > > > >> libs > > > >> with m2 pom and also house the libs themselves. I mean we can't > > > >> really > > > >> bother your people for every little thing like hibernate annotation > > > >> 3.1beta*7* or something else I mean come on, you have lives too :) > > > >> Same thing goes for spring libraries, or any other project. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
