Martijn Dashorst wrote:

of the repetition in the POM 4.0. It is unreadable due to the repetition of
dependencies, plugin management etc.

That's a structural question and *completely* unrelated to the question, how the POM looks syntactically.


I don't agree with the camp that it is just a matter of taste. If it were,
why is Spring adding the simplified support to their configuration file?

Because their taste has changed? :-)


Jochen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to