Martijn Dashorst wrote:
of the repetition in the POM 4.0. It is unreadable due to the repetition of dependencies, plugin management etc.
That's a structural question and *completely* unrelated to the question, how the POM looks syntactically.
I don't agree with the camp that it is just a matter of taste. If it were, why is Spring adding the simplified support to their configuration file?
Because their taste has changed? :-) Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]