exactly ! With maven, we can put multiple artifacts in the same directory (because we can directly specify the jar filename in the dependency).
Wouldn't it be cool to be able to do that again (in very extrem cases of course)? Loic On 1/20/06, Edwin Punzalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think he means to use it at build time for mvn use. > > > dan tran wrote: > > >how about create one big zip file?? then use antrun to unpack. > > > >I do that quite often > > > >-Dan > > > > > > > >On 1/19/06, Edwin Punzalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>You mean you want a single pom to have several jars associated with it? > >>This doesn't comply with the one-artifact-one-jar philosophy of maven > >>and so is not possible. > >> > >>Also, accdg to the maven gurus, such configuration you gave is possible > >>as long as the each jar you set as a dep is placed in the repository > >>(read: placed properly in the repository accdg to > >>groupId/artifacId/version). > >> > >> > >> > >>Loïc Lefèvre wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Hello, > >>>After some time struggling with my local repository I wonder if it's > >>>me doing mistakes or if > >>>the declaration of multiple project's components is too complex. > >>> > >>>Let's take my current example: > >>> > >>>In my local repository, I want to add LWJGL which is compound of > >>>multiple jar, dll, so, dylib and jnilib files; a total of 30 files! > >>> > >>>What I whish to do is to declare my repository like that: > >>> > >>>[local repo directory]\lwjgl\lwjgl\0.99\all the files + metadata.xml > >>>+.pom + .md5 + .sha1 > >>> > >>>In the pom (packaging pom) I could declare ALL the files required to > >>>use LWJGL 0.99 using dependencies. > >>> > >>>And in my project pom.xml file I could just add: > >>> > >>> <dependency> > >>> <groupId>lwjgl</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>lwjgl</artifactId> > >>> <type>pom</type> > >>> <version>0.99</version> > >>> </dependency> > >>> > >>>so all the 30 files would directly be downloaded... > >>> > >>>Moreover, (see a recent mail) LWJGL's dll/so files don't include the > >>>version number in their name so that Java code doesn't have to be > >>>modified with new versions... > >>> > >>>Well is it a dream or is it possible? > >>> > >>>TIA, > >>>Loic > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
