You are so right. Removing the extra configuration solved all of my cobertura problems.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
"Mike Perham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20-02-2006 15:44:17:
> David, you are way overcomplicating the cobertura setup. Remove your
> executions and the surefire config. There's no need - all this is
> handled internally when the plugin executes with 'cobertura:cobertura'.
>
> _____
>
> From: David Sag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:20 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: cobertura plugin
>
>
>
> Interesting
>
> the main difference between the way you do it and the way I am doing is
> that I specify the goal and execution phase in my build declarations
> thusly:
>
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> <executions>
> <execution>
> <id>instrument-classes</id>
> <phase>process-classes</phase>
> <goals>
> <goal>instrument</goal>
> </goals>
> </execution>
> </executions>
> </plugin>
>
> could this be causing my problem? i doubt it.
>
> Also I explicitly tell surefire where the instrumented classes are:
>
> <!-- run the unit tests on the cobertura instrumented classes -->
> <plugin>
> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>2.0</version>
> <configuration>
>
> <classesDirectory>${project.build.directory}/classes-instrumented</class
> esDirectory>
> </configuration>
> </plugin>
>
> otherwise we are doing pretty much the same thing.
>
> I can't see in your pom.xml how your tests know to run the instrumented
> classes, nor is it obvious in what phase you are instrumenting your
> classes. what sort of coverage reports are you getting?
>
> Kind regards,
> Dave Sag
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "javed mandary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20-02-2006 13:57:41:
>
> > Am running maven site with cobertura report generation:
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <project>
> > [.....]
> > <build>
> > <resources>
> > <resource>
> > <directory>src/main/resources</directory>
> > <includes>
> > <include>*.xls</include>
> > <include>**/*.xml</include>
> > <include>*.properties</include>
> > </includes>
> > </resource>
> > </resources>
> > <plugins>
> > <plugin>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> >
> <artifactId>surefire-report-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.0-beta-1</version>
> > <configuration>
> > <testFailureIgnore>true</testFailureIgnore>
> > </configuration>
> > </plugin>
> > <plugin>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> >
> <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > </plugin>
> > </plugins>
> > </build>
> > <reporting>
> > <plugins>
> > <plugin>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> >
> <artifactId>surefire-report-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.0-beta-1</version>
> > </plugin>
> > <plugin>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > </plugin>
> > </plugins>
> > </reporting>
> >
> > <dependencies>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>asm</groupId>
> > <artifactId>asm</artifactId>
> > <version>1.5.3</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <scope>test</scope>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <artifactId>jta</artifactId>
> > <groupId>javax.transaction</groupId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <artifactId>jdbc-stdext</artifactId>
> > <groupId>javax.sql</groupId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <artifactId>jsf-api</artifactId>
> > <groupId>javax.faces</groupId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-remoting</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-core</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>axis</groupId>
> > <artifactId>axis</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.1</version>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <artifactId>activation</artifactId>
> > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <artifactId>mail</artifactId>
> > <groupId>javax.mail</groupId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>axis</groupId>
> > <artifactId>axis-jaxrpc</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.1</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>axis</groupId>
> > <artifactId>axis-saaj</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.1</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > </dependencies>
> > </project>
> >
> > On 2/20/06, David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I guess we are having different problems. In a reply to my Jira
> issue
> > > Carlos Sanchez points out that my problem lies in the fact that
> cobertura is
> > > trying to instrument the classes twice. I am not sure why this is
> > > happening, nor am i sure why this is even a problem, but clearly you
> are not
> > > getting this problem.
> > >
> > > could you show me your pom.xml so i can look for any obvious
> differences
> > > between what you are doing and what I am doing.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Dave Sag
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20-02-2006
> 09:05:19:
> > >
> > > > this problem was fixed in SVN (asm is no longer propogated to
> tests
> > > > themselves)
> > > >
> > > > On 2/20/06, javed mandary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi David,
> > > > > I solved the problem with the Cobertura plugin
> running
> > > > > hibernate junit tests by adding the following dependency in my
> POM:
> > > > >
> > > > > <dependency>
> > > > > <groupId>asm</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>asm</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>1.5.3</version>
> > > > > </dependency>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that Cobertura is looking for asm-2.1 in its POM while
> > > hibernate
> > > > > requires asm-1.5.3.
> > > > >
> > > > > By setting the dependency asm-1.5.3 , this is placed in
> classpath and
> > > > > everything works fine , cobertura site report is generated
> > > successfully.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > > Javed
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/17/06, David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maven 2 is what I am on about. see the jira issue, but i am
> getting
> > > the
> > > > > > same problem as you describe. perhaps you'd like to vote on
> > > > that issue and
> > > > > > add your comments there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > Dave Sag
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "javed mandary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17-02-2006
> 14:14:17:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ok , what about the cobertura plugin for maven 2 ? In maven
> site I
> > > am
> > > > > > > getting a problem after cobertura runs the junit tests and
> tryto
> > > create
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > report it crashes and fails the build.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone got similar problems and any solutions to that?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > this is what i am using:
> > > > > > > <plugin>
> > > > > > > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > > > > > >
> <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > > > > > > <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > > > > > > <executions>
> > > > > > > <execution>
> > > > > > > <goals>
> > > > > > > <goal>clean</goal>
> > > > > > > </goals>
> > > > > > > </execution>
> > > > > > > </executions>
> > > > > > > </plugin>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > Javed
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2/17/06, David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Brett
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have files jira issue http://jira.codehaus.
> > org/browse/MOJO-299and
> > > > > > > > included an example project that displays the bug.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if you could put your repo manager code somewhere in a zip
> file
> > > I can
> > > > > > try
> > > > > > > > it out here and see if I get the same problems.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > Dave Sag
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17-02-2006
> > > 13:33:08:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi David,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > There might be a release coming up, but we haven't
> worked on
> > > your
> > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > there are still some other issues outstanding that
> should be
> > > fixed
> > > > > > > > first.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If you could confirm that cobertura fails for you on the
> > > repository
> > > > > > > > manager
> > > > > > > > > app (if SVN is a problem I can upload it somewhere),
> that
> > > would
> > > > > > isolate
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > to you environment over your particular project.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Brett
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 2/17/06, David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sorry brett the last i heard from you was that you
> were
> > > working on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > problem and there would be a release late this week.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So I have been working on other things and waiting
> > > paitiently.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But if you are now telling me I need to file a jira
> issue
> > > then
> > > > > > that's
> > > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > > > i'll do.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'll have to put together a minimal project and
> reproduce
> > > the
> > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > some code that is not the EPOs tho. This probably
> won't
> > > happen
> > > > > > today.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Dave Sag
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
> 17-02-2006
> > > > > > 13:20:42:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 2/17/06, David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry are you talking about maven 1 or 2 plugin?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > They are talking about Maven 1.0
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I was told that 2.0-SNAPSHOT is the one to use for
> maven 2
> > > but
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > > > > > updating to maven 2.0.2 the reporting part of
> cobertura
> > > hasn't
> > > > > > > > worked.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can't reproduce it. If it never gets filed in
> JIRA,
> > > it'll
> > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > fixed... can you please do that at
> > > > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Did you try the repository manager example I showed
> you
> > > last
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > working for me?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - Brett
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
>
