Jonathan, thanks for your fast reply. Finally, I have found a comparison here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix But, still I do not understand what is the "tighter integration with Maven 2" all about. Using CC I still can invoke Maven (1 or 2 -- does it matter?) through the shell interface -- isn't it?
Johnson, Jonathan wrote: > If you are looking for a richer feature set stick with CruiseControl. > > Continuum is still relatively new and many features you have > CruiseControl are not yet available in Continuum. > > I chose to try Continuum because of my simple build requirements which > will grow hopefully with the Continuum and Maven 2 feature sets. In > addition I opted for Continuums tighter integration with Maven 2. > > If the feature sets were the same I would recommend Continuum because of > it tighter integration with Maven 2. > > Many of the feature you might expect to find in Continuum are really in > Maven 2 (where they should be, well.. at least when they are written as > a plugin for Maven 2). Be careful of comparing the apples to oranges. > Be aware that Maven 2 and Continuum have only been around for a few > months and more features are anticipated this year. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 2:59 PM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Why Continuum? > > Hi all, > > I am trying to find the answer to this question with no success. > Currently, I am using CruiseControl -- why should I (or others like me) > switch to Continuum? > > Adrian. > > > LEGAL NOTICE: > Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be > privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure > or copying of the contents or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on > it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please > inform the sender immediately. > > >