Same here. I think the documentation is a little bit too fragmented and it intimidated some people, they don't know where to start and they wonder in wich order they should read the documents. Maybe you should provide some *tracks* à la Cocoon. What do you think?
On 3/12/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Roberto, > > I don't know what do you mean with "the lack of the j2ee support" > because we are using it for web applications, ejbs, ears, web > services,... > > Regards > > On 3/11/06, Roberto N Nanamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I use maven 1.1 in my project in Bank of America and it has been very handy. > > > > > > > > > > But I reluctant to migrate to Maven 2.0 because of the lack of the j2ee > > support. > > > > > > > > It does not matter how nice and wonderful the new features of Maven 2.0 are, > > at the end of day is how it can support serious work. I can play it around > > for "entertainment" but I will stick to Maven 1 until I see a minimum of > > enterprise level application support in Maven 2.0 (and I am including j2ee > > and web services in the minimum requirement level). > > > > > > > > If maven 2 wants to be taken seriously it MUST support j2ee and web services > > otherwise maven 1.1 will stick for much longer than you expect. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good work on maven 1 and I hope maven 2 will improve (at lot > > - with much better documentation) > > > > > > > > Roberto N Nanamura > > > > > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Alexandre Poitras Québec, Canada --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
