Done, CONTINUUM-637 and CONTINUUM-638

Actually, CONTINUUM-638 only happens with parent/module - not with
dependency.

BTW, I had a question about migration to 1.0.3. Can we keep old
build-output-directory and working-directory or do we have to re-create them
from scratch ? I believe you wrote about a migration tool, but I can't find
the thread anymore...

On 3/24/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yann Le Du a écrit :
> > Hi Emmanuel,
> >
> > I just tried 20060324.020000 and my problem about 2 build definitions
> with
> > the same schedule is seemlingly still happening. But now, only the
> *first*
> > definition is executed.
> >
> > You can try with this simple example :
> > Definition 1 : clean site-deploy - DEFAULT_SCHEDULE
> > Definition 2 : clean install - DEFAULT_SCHEDULE (default buld
> definition)
> >
> > Only Definition 1 is executed.
>
> You're right, the second is launched but without changes, it doesn't run
> the build. I'll look at it
>
> >
> > I also noticed antoher thing. You have projects A and B in Continuum. B
> > depends on A (in my case, A is the parent of B). B has a build
> definition
> > for a given schedule, but A has *no* build definition for this schedule.
> > Then B build won't be executed, probably because it waits for A
> execution
> > first - which won't happen.
>
> hmm, strange. I'll look at it.
>
> Can you file two issues for these problems (with 1.0.3 fixed version)?
>
> Emmanuel
> >
> > Don't hesitate if you need more details.
> >
> > On 3/24/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>I have this error only when i shutdown continuum. I fixed it.
> >>
> >>Emmanuel
> >>
> >>Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> >>
> >>>Not reproduce (strange ?).
> >>>Sorry for noise.
> >>>
> >>>- Olivier
> >>>
> >>>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>>De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Envoyé : vendredi 24 mars 2006 10:26
> >>>À : 'continuum-users@maven.apache.org'
> >>>Objet : RE : Re: RE : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>Thanks emmanuel.
> >>>
> >>>Note the env :
> >>>- solaris : uname -a >  5.9 Generic_118558-13 sun4u sparc
> >>>SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240
> >>>- JAVA_HOME -> j2sdk1.4.2_04
> >>>- using $CONTINUUM/bin/plexus.sh (not using wrapper)
> >>>- snapshot 20060317.073000
> >>>
> >>>I will try today to reproduce it (I need to way the next schedule 11H00
> >>>Paris Time, suspens ;-) )
> >>>
> >>>- Olivier
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>>De : Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Envoyé : vendredi 24 mars 2006 00:10
> >>>À : continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> >>>Objet : Re: Re: RE : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yann, it's fixed now, all build definitions on the same schedule are
> >>>executed.
> >>>
> >>>Olivier, I can't reproduce your problem.
> >>>
> >>>Emmanuel
> >>>
> >>>Yann Le Du a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Everything is working fine for me, especially
> >>>>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-577
> >>>>
> >>>>I fail to reproduce Olivier's problem, either with 20060316.173001 or
> >>>>20060317.073000 . Only one of both definitions is executed (the last
> >>>>one in the list), but Continuum doesn't stop.
> >>>>
> >>>>Big thanks for this new version !
> >>>>
> >>>>- Yann
> >>>>
> >>>>On 3/20/06, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In fact not so good.
> >>>>>Log :
> >>>>>2006-03-18 09:40:52,260 [Thread-7] ERROR
> >>>>>org.codehaus.plexus.summit.pull.PullService  - Problem disp osing
> >>>>>global tools: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> >>>>>      at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry (HashMap.java:782)
> >>>>>      at java.util.HashMap$KeyIterator.next(HashMap.java:818)
> >>>>>      at
> >>>>>org.codehaus.plexus.summit.pull.DefaultPullService.disposeGlobalTools
> (
> >>>
> >>>De
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>fault
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This stop continuum.
> >>>>>Simple test with two build definition on the same project and with
> the
> >>>>>same schedule (I know not a normal use case ;-) but it failed).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Snapshot : continuum-20060317.073000
> >>>>>
> >>>>>- Olivier
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>>>>De : Olivier Lamy [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>Envoyé : vendredi 17 mars 2006 17:20
> >>>>>À : 'continuum-users@maven.apache.org'
> >>>>>Objet : RE : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>I have made some tests and it looks ok.
> >>>>>Especially the issue concerning reading $HOME/.m2/settings.xml
> >>>>>(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-590 )
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Good job.
> >>>>>You don't have to wait maven 2.0.3 release ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>- Olivier
> >>>>>
> >>>>>PS : I'm not an orange fan but no problem ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>>>>De : Emmanuel Venisse [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>Envoyé : jeudi 16 mars 2006 22:33
> >>>>>À : continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> >>>>>Objet : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I think it's time to release Continuum 1.0.3. This release will
> >>>>>incorporate 65 issues, including some critical fixes. The full
> listing
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>of fixes can be found here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&style
> >>>>>Na
> >>>>>me=Html&version=12330
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If you're interested, you can take the current release candidate for
> a
> >>>>>test drive. The RC tarball is at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/branches/continuum-1.0
> >>>>>.x<
> http://maven.zones.apache.org/%7Econtinuum/builds/branches/continuu
> >>>>>m-1.0.x>
> >>>>>/continuum-20060316.173001.tar.gz
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Cheers,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Emmanuel
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This e-mail, any attachments and the information contained therein
> >>>>>("this
> >>>>>message") are confidential and intended solely for the use of the
> >>>>>addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please send
> >>>
> >>>it back
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication, use,
> >>>
> >>>dissemination or
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>disclosure of this message, either in whole or in part is strictly
> >>>>>prohibited.
>
> >>>>>**********************************************************************
> >>>>>Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers joints ainsi que  les
> >>>>>informations contenues dans ce message ( ci après "le message" ),
> sont
> >>>>>confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage de la  personne à
> >>>
> >>>laquelle
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, merci  de
> >>>
> >>>le
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>renvoyer à son émetteur et de le détruire. Toutes diffusion,
> >>>
> >>>publication,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque forme que se soit non
> >>>>>expressément autorisées de ce message, sont interdites.
>
> >>>>>**********************************************************************
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>This e-mail, any attachments and the information contained therein
> >>
> >>("this message") are confidential and intended solely for the use of the
> >>addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please send it
> back
> >>to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication, use,
> dissemination or
> >>disclosure of this message, either in whole or in part is strictly
> >>prohibited.
> >>
>
> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers joints ainsi que  les
> >>
> >>informations contenues dans ce message ( ci après "le message" ), sont
> >>confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage de la  personne à
> laquelle
> >>ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, merci  de le
> >>renvoyer à son émetteur et de le détruire. Toutes diffusion,
> publication,
> >>totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque forme que se soit non
> >>expressément autorisées de ce message, sont interdites.
> >>
>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to