Maybe you are using an old version of the surefire plugin inside
cruisecontrol. Force it using <version> inside build/plugins/plugin in
your pom

On 4/5/06, Jens Zastrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are right, it works using maven2 from the commandline.
> In my case it is used within Cruisecontrol..
> May there a problem with different versions of junit.jar usd by maven2
> and cruisecontrol???
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos
> Sanchez
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:48 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: [surefire] xml report not well formed <failure.message>
> contains <
>
> There's a test case
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-surefire-plug
> in/src/it/test3
> and it's working correctly
>
> On 4/4/06, Jens Zastrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the message attribute of the <failure> element contains < - the text
> > inside <failure> is escaped correctly.
> >
> > [pom.xml]
> > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.1.3</version>
> >
> > [report.xml]
> >  <testcase time="0.615" name="testCheckValidityForIssuer">
> >     <failure type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError"
> > message="expected:<1> but
> was:<2>">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
> > expected:&lt;1&gt; b
> > ut was:&lt;2&gt;
> >         at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
> >         at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:282)
> >         at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
> >         at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
> >         at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:207)
> >         at
> > de.dailab.security.control.pki.component.spki.tests.junit.JUnit_SPKIVa
> > li dityCheckerBean.testCheckValidityForIssuer(JUnit_SPKIValidityChecke
> > rBean.java:138)
> >         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >         at
> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.j
> > av
> > a:39)
> >         at
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccess
> > or
> > Impl.java:25)
> >         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> >         at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
> >         at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
> >         at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
> >         at
> junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
> >         at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
> >         at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
>                              -- The Princess Bride
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to